Skip to main content
Technical SEO Consulting

Your content is fine. Search engines cannot reach it.

We find what is blocking crawling, indexing, rendering and page speed, rank the fixes by revenue impact rather than crawler severity, and stay on the job until they ship.

  • Crawl and indexation issues fixed, not just reported
  • Core Web Vitals judged on CrUX field data, not lab scores
  • Validated in Search Console before the engagement closes
Technical SEO dashboards showing crawl inspection, indexing coverage and Core Web Vitals gauges
The pattern we keep finding

Three problems account for most stalled organic growth

Each one suppresses performance on its own. When all three are present they also corrupt the analytics used to measure everything else, so the reporting agrees that nothing is wrong.

01
Discovery

Crawl and indexation gaps

Thin or duplicate pages, broken canonicals and poor sitemap hygiene stop the right URLs being discovered. Crawl budget drains into parameter and tag pages while revenue pages wait.

Fixed at template level, verified in Search Console
02
Experience

Core Web Vitals failing where it counts

Slow LCP, layout shift and interactivity delays on the templates carrying the most traffic. It costs conversions before it costs rankings, which is why it usually goes unnoticed.

Measured on CrUX field data, not a lab score
03
Measurement

Tracking you cannot trust

Messy GA4 and Tag Manager setups, missing events and fragmented data layers. When the numbers do not reconcile, budget follows whichever channel reports most confidently.

Rebuilt so reporting matches the CRM
Our approach

Audit every layer, fix in priority order

A site can have strong content and still not rank, because Googlebot cannot reach the right pages, vitals fail on the templates that generate most traffic, or the GA4 data behind the decisions is recording the wrong events.

We audit those layers in sequence, set a measurable baseline, then fix in the order that produces the fastest gain in crawl coverage and reporting accuracy.

Every engagement produces

  • A technical audit across templates, not sample pages
  • GA4 and Tag Manager verification with a documented event map
  • A schema and content operations plan
  • A prioritised roadmap your developers can action directly
  • Crawl alerts and Search Console anomaly monitoring
Design Thinking SEO loop

User insight, diagnosis, execution, measured impact

1

Empathize

Understand behaviour and search intent through GA4, Search Console and session data.

2

Define

Diagnose technical and structural gaps. Set baselines for vitals and crawl coverage.

3

Ideate

Generate fixes prioritised by business value rather than crawler severity.

4

Prototype

Ship controlled changes to schema, data layer, architecture and vitals.

5

Test and scale

Measure outcomes, automate monitoring, scale what proves effective.

Proof

Multi-location healthcare platform, 150 days

Stagnant growth despite strong brand authority. The constraint was indexing, thin location pages and a weak technical foundation.

78%Organic traffic growth in 150 days
53%Crawl efficiency gain after de-indexing 800+ URLs
4.2×Rich result impressions after schema rollout
1.9sMobile LCP, down from 4.1 seconds
By sector

Where technical problems cost the most

The audit methodology is consistent. What differs is which technical problem carries the highest revenue cost in each sector, and which fix produces the fastest improvement in qualified organic sessions.

Real Estate

Multi-location architecture, local landing pages, and schema that keep listings crawlable, indexable and synced with Google Business Profiles.

Real Estate services

D2C & Digital Commerce

Core Web Vitals on product and category templates, schema validated against the Rich Results Test, and faceted navigation control that stops crawl budget draining into near-identical filter URLs.

Digital Commerce services

B2B SaaS & IT

Indexation control across feature and documentation pages, internal linking that passes authority to commercial pages, and SoftwareApplication and HowTo schema for product-category queries.

B2B SaaS & IT services
Common questions

Technical SEO, answered directly

Each answer opens with the answer, which is what a busy reader and an answer engine both take.

How do I know if my website has technical SEO problems?
Three signals point at the foundation rather than the content. Search Console reports far more indexed URLs than pages you published, which means parameter, tag or filter pages are consuming crawl budget. New pages take weeks rather than days to appear. And rankings move sharply after unrelated releases, which suggests fragile templates. In one healthcare engagement, over 1,200 non-essential URLs were indexed before we started.
What does technical SEO consulting include?
A crawl and indexation review, site architecture and internal linking analysis, JavaScript rendering checks, Core Web Vitals measured against CrUX field data, structured data review, and an audit of canonicals, robots directives, sitemaps and redirects. The deliverable is a roadmap prioritised by business impact and implementation effort, not a list of every issue a crawler can surface.
How long does technical SEO take to show results?
Crawl and indexing fixes often show inside four to six weeks because you are removing a blocker rather than building authority. Architecture and content depth work runs two to three quarters. A multi-location healthcare platform reached 78 percent organic growth in 150 days, from de-indexing, architecture, schema and Core Web Vitals work shipping together.
How is technical SEO different from on-page SEO?
On-page SEO works on a single page: its title, headings, copy and links. Technical SEO works on the system that page sits inside: whether search engines can crawl it, render it, place it correctly in the hierarchy and serve it quickly. On-page work improves one page. Technical work changes what every page built from that template can earn.
Does technical SEO help during a redesign or migration?
This is where it matters most and where it is most often skipped. A redesign changes URLs, templates, internal linking and rendering at once, so a migration without SEO quality assurance is the most common cause of a sudden traffic drop. Pre-launch template checks, redirect mapping and post-launch validation cost far less than a recovery project.
Do you help with implementation or only deliver the audit?
Both. Recommendations are written so a developer can act without a translation layer, then we support execution through quality assurance, developer coordination and post-release validation. In the healthcare engagement we worked alongside the client's own development team rather than replacing it.

Start with what is actually indexed

A short call, then a written view of what is blocking organic growth and what we would fix first. If the foundation is sound and the problem sits elsewhere, we will say so.